![]() Samsung offers Q-Symphony Sound, which lets the TV add height and presence to the audio presentation when combined with a Samsung soundbar. I think it is the best-sounding TV on the market.īoth TVs offer a feature that allows them to play nicely with outboard audio systems. It’s just that the A95K boasts beefy subwoofer output and the fact that the screen is the speaker system. The Samsung S95B sounds extremely good in its own right - I doubt anyone would be anything less than impressed with how it sounds. The Sony A95K is the clear winner here, but that’s because the A95K’s onboard sound quality is just insanely good. There is some HDR-specific stuff to talk about, but that’s coming up in a moment. Otherwise, both have the apps you need, and those apps perform well on both TVs. Chromecast is also built-in with Google TV, which makes sharing content from one’s mobile device just that much easier. Having Google Assistant for voice commands works great, and I prefer Google TV’s layout. But for daily use, Google TV gets my vote. Samsung’s Tizen is perfectly fine - most of the time. I have a Samsung TV at home, on which I use Chromecast with Google TV. With the S95B, you get Samsung’s Tizen OS, and with the A95K, there’s Google TV running on Android. Next, I want to point to each TV’s smart TV OS platform. I will, however, point out that there are A/V receivers that offer multiple HDMI 2.1 ports and can make accommodating lots of high-end gear a bit easier. If the answer is yes, you do need four HDMI 2.1 ports and that’s more important than anything else, well, then I guess you’re done with this comparison. Do you have enough gear that supports 4K 120Hz HDR VRR output to need more than two HDMI 2.1 ports? Set aside the argument that if you pay this much for a TV, then you should get all of the latest stuff, and instead consider your actual needs. Think very carefully about whether this is really a big deal to you. The Samsung S95B supports the HDMI 2.1 bandwidth on all four ports, while the Sony has two high-bandwidth ports, one of which also is the eARC port. And, perhaps best of all, Sony has a remote finder feature, and the little alarm built into it is plenty loud, making the remote easily recoverable even if it somehow gets buried deep within the recesses of an overstuffed couch. For another, it’s got a few dedicated buttons that I want. But, otherwise, it’s a great, forward-thinking remote. I also wish the Samsung S95B’s remote was backlit. Sometimes I want a dedicated button to get straight to - let’s say the settings menu - and this remote relies a bit more on the TV’s on-screen interface to help you get to your desired destination. I like that the remote is simple, but, again, only to a point. The slimmer it is, the easier it is to lose in the couch or chair cushions. I also like that the remote is slim – but only to a point. There is a USB-C port on the bottom if you happen to live in a dark cave at the edge of civilization, but most folks won’t need it. That’s because it can charge via solar, and it charges with radio waves already floating around in your home. What I like about the Samsung remote is that you’ll never have to replace the batteries, and you probably won’t ever have to charge it, either. With that in mind, here’s my take on each TV’s remote. But the fact that it has a huge influence on how much you enjoy interacting with your TV isn’t something at the forefront of most folks’ minds when making a purchase decision. ]I think a lot of folks overlook the fact that they interact with their remote every time they want to watch TV. By all rights, the Samsung S95B’s design is far more practical and could be the better choice for most people. While Sony’s design is less practical, I like the modernist approach. Which do I like better? If we’re including the stand, then I prefer the Sony. From the front, they are both attractive TVs, though I’ll point out that the Sony has a strip toward the bottom that’s a bit larger than the strip on the bottom of the Samsung. So even with the tightest of wall mounts, you’ll have a little bit of a gap between the TV’s panel and the wall. Sony’s takes up more real estate on the back surface, but the depth of the bump-out between the two is the same. Both of them have superthin display panels, and both have a bit of a bump-out on the back. If you’re wall-mounting, suddenly the visual differences between the two TVs are more subtle. So for that TV, you’ll route cables down along the back of the pedestal and cover it up with an included cover plate. But the Samsung has a little room with a view. The Sony doesn’t need to offer much in terms of cable management because it’s going to hide whatever is behind it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |